Damon Cann (Utah State University) & Greg Goelzhauser (Utah State University – Department of Political Science) have posted The Impact of Oral Argument Attendance (Journal of Law and Courts, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
How does oral argument attendance impact public perceptions of the judiciary? Judicial independence is partly contingent on public support, but the conditions that generate institutional good will are not well understood. We examine how judicial outreach and court exposure inform public attitudes. Leveraging a field-experiment randomizing in-person attendance at oral arguments conducted by a federal circuit court of appeals on a university campus, we find that exposure increases perceptions of institutional legitimacy and the extent to which judicial decisions are motivated by law versus politics. The results have important implications for judicial politics and policy debates concerning reform initiatives involving circuit riding, courtroom cameras, and public outreach.
Recommended.