Bijal Shah (Boston College Law School) has posted Envisioning a Protective Administrative Law Framework, Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. ___ (forthcoming), on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
The administrative state is an instrument of deprivation and intrusion. While civil rights statutes and constitutional law have sought to rectify some of these dangers, the role of administrative law has been undervalued. This Essay explores the idea that administrative law tools drawn from the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) could be utilized to protect people engaging with or targeted by the administrative agencies, including as directed by the President, in a manner that is complementary to—but distinct from—civil rights and constitutional law models. In doing so, it locates administrative law in conversations about preserving individual interests vis-à-vis the administrative state. Indeed, the APA is a cornerstone of administrative law that offers possibilities for constraining damaging administrative behavior, including violence furthered by nontransparent, arbitrary and authoritarian enforcement policies. More specifically, this Essay explores the use of notice-and-comment rulemaking; arbitrary and capricious review; and APA-based review of administrative violations of individual liberties. To ground its treatment of the APA, it focuses on immigration enforcement, a context in which the President’s influence is clear. The suggested approaches fit within current doctrine, are useful across presidential administrations, and may also be pertinent to restraining harmful administration outside of the immigration context.
Recommended!
To receive new posts from Legal Theory Blog by email, get a free subscription to Legal Theory Stack.
Lawrence Solum