Samuli Seppänen (The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) – Faculty of Law) has posted Ideological Renewal and Nostalgia in China's 'Avant-Garde' Legal Scholarship (Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Vol. 13, Issue 1, 2014) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
This Article examines certain attempts in Chinese legal scholarship to formulate alternatives to “Western” or “liberal” rule of law ideology. The Article discusses three different strands of contemporary Chinese “avantgarde” legal scholarship: (i) neo-conservative critical scholarship, which builds on American legal realism, critical legal studies, and critical social theory; (ii) a form of New Confucian virtue-based legal thought, which combines traditionalist Chinese ethics with Western virtue ethics; and (iii) certain communitarian rule of law theories. The Article identifies a paradox in the premise of Chinese avant-garde scholars’ ideological renewal project: avant-garde scholars can only hope to create illusions of ideological change, often through nostalgic arguments, lest their proposals appear too unrealistic or outlandish.
Highly recommended.
It is unfortunate that Seppänen fails to consider Linghao Wang's important work on Confucian forms of virtue jurisprudence. I was privileged to serve as a co-author on the linked-to paper, but all credit belongs to Professor Wang.