Conkle on Fundamentalism
Daniel O. Conkle (Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington) has posted Secular Fundamentalism, Religious Fundamentalism, and the Search for Truth in Contemporary America (Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 12, p. 337, 1995-96) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
- In this article, I suggest that America’s ongoing culture war is a product, in part, of an epistemic crisis that confounds our collective search for truth. In a previous article addressing aspects of this topic, I expressed concerns about religious fundamentalism. Here, I explore the ways in which secular thinking might likewise be described as “fundamentalist.” In particular, I discuss secular fundamentalism in textual interpretation, secular fundamentalism in the form of political liberalism, and comprehensive secular fundamentalism, which extends to private questions of truth. I then discuss the various problems – not only political, but also theological – that are raised by fundamentalist thinking, whether religious or secular in nature. In place of these various sorts of fundamentalism, I advocate a dialogic, multi-lingual search for truth, a search that would give meaningful consideration to moral arguments of all types – not only in private life, but in the public domain as well.